Frequently Asked Questions
node_modules
folder use disk space if packages are stored in a global store?
Why does my pnpm creates hard links from the global store to project's node_modules
folders.
Hard links point to the same place on the disk where the original files are.
So, for example, if you have foo
in your project as a dependency and it occupies 1MB of space,
then it will look like it occupies 1MB of space in the project's node_modules
folder and
the same amount of space in the global store. However, that 1MB is the same space on the disk
addressed from two different locations. So in total foo
occupies 1MB,
not 2MB.
For more on this subject:
- Why do hard links seem to take the same space as the originals?
- A thread from the pnpm chat room
- An issue in the pnpm repo
Does it work on Windows? It is harder to create symlinks on Windows
Using symlinks on Windows is problematic indeed. That is why pnpm uses junctions instead of symlinks on Windows OS.
node_modules
approach is basically incompatible with Windows
Does it work on Windows? Nested Early versions of npm had issues because of nesting all node_modules
(see Node's nested node_modules approach is basically incompatible with Windows). However, pnpm does not create deep folders, it stores all packages flatly and uses symlinks to create the dependency tree structure.
What about circular symlinks?
Although pnpm uses symlinks to put dependencies into node_modules
folders, circular symlinks are avoided because parent packages are placed into the same node_modules
folder in which their dependencies are. So foo
's dependencies are not in foo/node_modules
but foo
is in node_modules/foo
, together with its own dependencies.
Why have hard links at all? Why not symlink directly to the global store?
One package can have different sets of dependencies on one machine.
In project A foo@1.0.0
can have dependency resolved to bar@1.0.0
but in project B the same dependency of foo
might resolve to bar@1.1.0
. So pnpm hard links foo@1.0.0
to every project where it is used, in order to create different sets of dependencies for it.
Direct symlinking to the global store would work with Node's --preserve-symlinks
flag. But --preserve-symlinks
comes
with a bunch of different issues, so we decided to stick with hard links.
For more details about why this decision was made, see: https://github.com/nodejs/node-eps/issues/46.
Does pnpm work across multiple hard drives or filesystems?
The package store should be on the same disk as installations. Otherwise packages will be copied, not linked. This is due to a OS limitation in hard-linking. See Issue #712 for more details.
pnpm functions differently based on the 2 cases below:
Store path is specified
If the store path is specified via the store config, then copying occurs between the store and any projects that are on a different disk.
If you run pnpm install
on disk D:
, then the pnpm store must be on disk D:
.
If the pnpm store is located on disk C:
, then all required packages will be directly copied to the project location.
This severely reduces the benefits of pnpm.
Store path is NOT specified
If the store path is not set, then multiple stores are created (one per each drive or filesystem).
If installation is run on disk D:
, the store will be created in D:\.pnpm-store
.
If later the installation is run on disk C:
, an independent store will be created in C:\.pnpm-store
.
The projects would still maintain the benefits of pnpm, but each drive may have redundant packages.
pnpm store prune
do? Is it harmful?
What does The command pnpm store prune
removes unreferenced packages.
Unreferenced packages are packages that are not used by any projects on the system. Packages can become unreferenced after most installation operations.
For example: during pnpm install
, package foo@1.0.0
is updated to foo@1.0.1
.
pnpm will keep foo@1.0.0
in the store, as it does not automatically remove packages.
If package foo@1.0.0
is not used by any other project on the system, it becomes unreferenced.
Running pnpm store prune
would remove foo@1.0.0
from the store.
Running pnpm store prune
is not harmful and has no side effects on your projects.
If future installations require removed packages, pnpm will download them again.
It is best practice to run pnpm store prune
occasionally to clean up the store, but not too frequently.
Sometimes, unreferenced packages become required again.
This could occur when switching branches and installing older dependencies.
Then pnpm would need to re-download all removed packages, briefly slowing down the installation process.
pnpm
stand for?
What does pnpm
stands for performant npm
. Rico Sta. Cruz came up with the name.
pnpm
does not work with <YOUR-PROJECT-HERE>?
In most cases it means that one of the dependencies require packages not declared in package.json
.
It is a common mistake caused by flat node_modules
. If this happens, this is an error in the dependency and the
dependency should be fixed. That might take time though, so pnpm supports workarounds to make the buggy packages work.
Solution 1
In the following example, a dependency does not have the iterall
module in its own list of deps.
The easiest solution to resolve missing dependencies of the buggy packages is to add iterall
as a dependency to our project's package.json
.
You can do so, by installing it via:
pnpm i iterall
It will be automatically added to your project's package.json
.
"dependencies": {
...
"iterall": "^1.2.2",
...
}
Solution 2
One of the solutions is to use hooks for adding the missing dependencies to the package's package.json
.
An example was Webpack Dashboard which wasn't working with pnpm
. It has since been resolved such that it works with pnpm
now.
It used to throw an error:
Error: Cannot find module 'babel-traverse'
at /node_modules/.registry.npmjs.org/inspectpack/2.2.3/node_modules/inspectpack/lib/actions/parse
The problem was that babel-traverse
was used in inspectpack
library which was used by webpack-dashboard
. But babel-traverse
wasn't specified in inspectpack
's package.json
. It still worked with npm
and yarn
because they create flat node_modules
.
Solution was to create a pnpmfile.js
with the following contents:
module.exports = {
hooks: {
readPackage (pkg) {
switch (pkg.name) {
case 'inspectpack':
pkg.dependencies['babel-traverse'] = '^6.26.0'
break
}
return pkg
}
}
}
After creating pnpmfile.js
, delete pnpm-lock.yaml
only. No need to delete node_modules
. Then install the dependencies & it should be working.
Solution 3
In case there are too many issues, you can use the shamefully-hoist
config. This creates a flat node_modules
structure similar to the one created by npm
or yarn
.
To use it, try pnpm install --shamefully-hoist
.